{"id":246,"date":"2026-08-25T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-08-25T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/makrolife-biotech.com\/blog\/?p=246"},"modified":"2026-07-30T05:50:58","modified_gmt":"2026-07-30T05:50:58","slug":"eu-cosmetics-regulation-2026-909","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/makrolife-biotech.com\/blog\/eu-cosmetics-regulation-2026-909\/","title":{"rendered":"EU Cosmetics Regulation 2026\/909"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">A second Annex update in the same year<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On 27 April 2026, the European Commission published Commission Regulation (EU) 2026\/909, amending Annexes II and III of the EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223\/2009. The regulation restricts or prohibits twelve substances following updated Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) opinions raising concerns about endocrine-disrupting and genotoxic potential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Two compliance dates apply: only compliant products may be placed on the EU market from 1 January 2027, and only compliant products may be made available on the EU market at all from 1 July 2028. Companies with lead times for reformulation, retesting and CPSR updates have roughly five months from today before the first deadline takes effect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The rule affects any company formulating with the twelve named substances, which span fragrance and flavour ingredients, UV-filter-adjacent compounds, hair-dye components, and antimicrobial or skin-conditioning agents such as zinc salts, so exposure is broader than a single product category.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is the second major update to the Cosmetics Regulation&#8217;s ingredient annexes in 2026. Commission Regulation (EU) 2026\/78, known as Omnibus VIII, already removed 15 CMR-classified (carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction) substances from Annex II with no transition period at all, effective 1 May 2026. Companies that have not yet reviewed formulas against both updates risk running two separate compliance projects instead of one combined review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What changes under Regulation (EU) 2026\/909?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The regulation covers twelve substances: benzyl salicylate, triphenyl phosphate, ammonium silver zinc aluminium silicate, aluminium, water-soluble zinc salts (including zinc acetate, zinc chloride, zinc gluconate, zinc glutamate, zinc citrate and zinc sulphate), acetylated vetiver oil, citral (together with its constituents geranial and neral), HC Blue No 18, HC Red No 18, HC Yellow No 16, hydroxypropyl-p-phenylenediamine and its dihydrochloride salt, and DHHB (diethylamino hydroxybenzoyl hexyl benzoate).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Triphenyl phosphate moves to Annex II, the list of substances prohibited outright in cosmetic products, because available data could not exclude its potential for genotoxicity. Cosmetic products containing it may not be placed on the EU market from 1 January 2027.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Benzyl salicylate, already listed under entry 75 of Annex III as a fragrance allergen subject to labelling above 0.001% (leave-on) and 0.01% (rinse-off), now receives an additional, tighter maximum concentration limit, driven by potential endocrine-disruption concerns rather than the allergen threshold alone.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Water-soluble zinc salts get harmonized, product-type- and, in some cases, age-specific conditions of use, relevant to oral care and skin-conditioning formulations.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Several hair-dye and UV-filter-adjacent substances, including HC Blue No 18, HC Red No 18, HC Yellow No 16, hydroxypropyl-p-phenylenediamine and DHHB, receive revised Annex III conditions rather than an outright ban.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Clarification: restricted vs. prohibited<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Annex II is a prohibition list: a substance listed there may not be used in cosmetic products at all, regardless of concentration or product type. Annex III is a restricted-use list: a substance remains permitted, but only under the specific conditions stated, typically a maximum concentration, a defined product type, or required warning wording.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under Regulation (EU) 2026\/909, triphenyl phosphate moves into Annex II, so it must be removed from formulas entirely. Benzyl salicylate stays in Annex III, so the response is reformulation to a lower concentration and updated documentation, not removal. Confirming which of these two situations applies to your formula is the first thing to check, since it determines whether the fix is &#8220;reformulate&#8221; or &#8220;remove.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Clarification: why restrict substances that were considered safe before?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Several of the twelve substances were previously permitted or in routine use under existing Annex III conditions. Restrictions like these typically follow a new or updated SCCS opinion, reassessing a substance against newer toxicological data, updated exposure estimates, or a revised hazard classification under the EU&#8217;s CLP (Classification, Labelling and Packaging) framework, which can trigger a &#8220;CMR&#8221; reclassification that then feeds into the Cosmetics Regulation. This is a routine, ongoing part of how the EU annexes are maintained, not a signal that the earlier assessment was flawed; it does mean formulators should expect periodic Annex updates and treat ingredient monitoring as a continuous task rather than a one-time check.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What should cosmetics companies check?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Screen every formula for all twelve named substances<\/strong>, not only the ones with the most media attention. Zinc salts and hair-dye components are easy to overlook next to triphenyl phosphate.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Flag any use of triphenyl phosphate for immediate reformulation.<\/strong>\u00a0As an Annex II substance from 1 January 2027, no concentration is permitted, and lead times for finding and validating a replacement carrier or plasticizer should be planned now.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Recalculate benzyl salicylate concentrations against the new Annex III cap<\/strong>, separately from its existing fragrance-allergen labelling threshold. A formula compliant on labelling may still exceed the new concentration limit.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Review zinc-salt-containing oral care and skin-conditioning products against the revised conditions of use<\/strong>, including any age-specific restrictions relevant to children&#8217;s products.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cross-check formulas against both 2026\/909 and Omnibus VIII (2026\/78) in a single audit<\/strong>, since the two updates were published only months apart and share overlapping product categories.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Update the CPSR and CPNP notification<\/strong>\u00a0for any formula that changes as a result, so the safety file, the notification record and the label stay aligned.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Common implementation risks<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Screening only for triphenyl phosphate, the &#8220;headline&#8221; ban, and missing the tighter concentration limit now applied to already-permitted benzyl salicylate.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Confusing this update with Omnibus VIII&#8217;s CMR bans, which cover different substances and had no transition period at all.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Assuming a raw-material supplier&#8217;s declaration already reflects the new conditions of use, when it may still be written against the pre-2026\/909 Annex III entry.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Underestimating reformulation and stability-retesting timelines for products that relied on triphenyl phosphate as a solvent carrier or plasticizer.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Overlooking zinc-salt products marketed for children, where the new age-specific conditions of use are most likely to bite.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Leaving the safety assessor to update the CPSR from paperwork alone, without re-verifying actual finished-product concentrations analytically.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Treating 1 January 2027 as distant; reformulation, retesting and CPSR review routinely take longer than the months remaining before the deadline.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How Makrolife can support Regulation 2026\/909 compliance<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Quantitative analytical screening for all twelve restricted or prohibited substances in finished formulas and raw materials.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Concentration verification against the new Annex III limits for benzyl salicylate and the other revised entries.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Coordinated CPSR review and CPNP notification updates alongside your safety assessor.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A combined audit against both Regulation (EU) 2026\/909 and Omnibus VIII (2026\/78) in one pass, rather than two separate projects.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The goal across all of this: one consistent regulatory record across formula, label and safety file, rather than separate answers from the lab, the formulator and the safety assessor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Does your formulation library contain any of these twelve substances?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">With the first compliance date on 1 January 2027 and reformulation timelines often running longer than the months remaining, the fastest way to know your exposure is a targeted analytical screen against the updated Annex II and Annex III entries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Request an ingredient restriction check against Regulation (EU) 2026\/909 from Makrolife Biotech.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Sources<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Commission Regulation (EU) 2026\/909 of 27 April 2026 amending Regulation (EC) No 1223\/2009 &#8211; EUR-Lex,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/eli\/reg\/2026\/909\/oj\/eng\">eur-lex.europa.eu\/eli\/reg\/2026\/909\/oj\/eng<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>CIRS Group, &#8220;EU Updates Cosmetic Regulation: Restrictions &amp; Requirements Revision on 12 Cosmetic Ingredients&#8221; &#8211;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cirs-group.com\/en\/cosmetics\/eu-updates-cosmetic-regulation-restrictions-and-requirements-revision-on-12-cosmetic-ingredients\">cirs-group.com<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>REACH24H, &#8220;EU Regulation (EU) 2026\/909: Comprehensive Interpretation of New Cosmetic Ingredient Restrictions&#8221; &#8211;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.reach24h.com\/news\/insights\/cosmetic\/eu-regulation-2026-909-cosmetic-ingredient-restrictions\">en.reach24h.com<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Personal Care Insights, &#8220;EU restricts 12 cosmetics ingredients amid health concerns&#8221; &#8211;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.personalcareinsights.com\/news\/eu-cosmetics-ingredient-regulations.html\">personalcareinsights.com<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cosmeservice, &#8220;EU Cosmetics Regulation 2026\/909 Explained&#8221; &#8211;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cosmeservice.com\/news\/eu-cosmetics-regulation-2026-909-restrictions-deadlines\/\">cosmeservice.com<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>HPRA, &#8220;Omnibus Act VIII &#8211; new substances added to the list of ingredients restricted or prohibited in cosmetics from May 2026&#8221; &#8211;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.hpra.ie\/regulation\/cosmetics\/cosmetics-regulation\/updates-to-restricted-and-prohibited-ingredients-in-cosmetic-products\/omnibus-act-viii---new-substances-added-to-the-list-of-ingredients-restricted-or-prohibited-in-cosmetics-from-may-2026\">hpra.ie<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A second Annex update in the same year On 27 April 2026, the European Commission published Commission Regulation (EU) 2026\/909, amending Annexes II and III of the EU\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":247,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[51,49,47,54,52,53,55,17,50,48],"class_list":["post-246","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-regulations","tag-annex-ii-annex-iii-cosmetics-regulation","tag-benzyl-salicylate-concentration-limit","tag-cosmetic-ingredient-restrictions-2027","tag-cosmetic-ingredient-testing-germany","tag-cpsr-reformulation","tag-eu-cosmetics-regulation-2026","tag-eu-cosmetics-regulation-2026-909","tag-regulation","tag-sccs-opinion-cosmetics","tag-triphenyl-phosphate-ban-cosmetics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/makrolife-biotech.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/makrolife-biotech.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/makrolife-biotech.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/makrolife-biotech.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/makrolife-biotech.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/makrolife-biotech.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":248,"href":"https:\/\/makrolife-biotech.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246\/revisions\/248"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/makrolife-biotech.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/247"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/makrolife-biotech.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/makrolife-biotech.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/makrolife-biotech.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}